Wednesday, November 5, 2014

Forewarned, Bureaucrats Don't Care


There's an adage that "forewarned is forearmed", meaning if you know of something before it happens, you can be prepared for it.
True enough.
And presumably make changes if undesired results might occur.


But GVW bureaucrats and engineers, and their engineering consultants either didn't believe it would happen...or they don't care.
Probably not in their job descriptions to care.

"We were completely blindsided when we received our first Vernon utility bill in the mail."
M.C.R. Krien

Ignoring cause and effect, bureaucrats are ALL about revenue.
The unparalleled gouging of residents by Greater Vernon Water officials surely wouldn't lead to residents abandoning Vernon.
Or would it?





A letter to the editor by M.C.R. Krien today explains what GVW officials didn't plan on--and certainly didn't want publicized if it did occur.

"...if the water usage isn't high enough they tack on an extra $72.30 per quarter for low consumption."

"When my wife and I first considered moving to Vernon, we thought we did our homework on property taxes and fees.  We moved here from another Okanagan location, had a more expensive home but our property taxes, including water, sewer, garbage, recycling (all these utility fees were included in our annual property tax bill), were still less than Vernon, nonetheless we decided we could live with the increase.

We were completely blindsided when we received our first Vernon utility bill in the mail.  These obscene utility rates have got to be Vernon's best kept secret.  Not a word mentioned by real estate agents or anyone else when we were enquiring about property tax rates and fees.  But since then, things have gone from bad to worse.

We received this quarter's water and sewer bill for a whopping $440.  We live on small lot in a gated community where all of the irrigation systems come on for the same amount of time each week.  We have dual-flush, water-saver toilets.  There are only two of us and we are away a great deal of the time.

We don't just let water run down the drain when we are washing fruit and vegetables, but instead run it into a bucket in the sink and then either use the wter to water shrubs and bushes or flush the toilet.  We only take short showers, don't have a hot tub and, as well, shut our irrigation off on rainy days and have a water-saver washing machine.

Furthermore we take our vehicles to the car wash instead of washing them at home.

I compared our utility bill with our neighbours to find that our bill was $200 higher and they often have their grandchildren staying with them.  And they thought their bill was high.  We did notice that our bill contained an extra charge for $72.30 for residential sewer low flat rate, which did not show on any of our neighbours' bills.

We went to city hall to enquire why our rates would be so high and for an explanation for the extra $72.30 charge.  It was explained to us that when they determine the sewer rates in the first quarter, if the water usage isn't high enough they tack on an extra $72.30 per quarter for low consumption.

Yes, that is for low consumption.

So while our neighbours are only paying $50.20 per quarter for base sewer rates, we are paying the $50.20 base rate plus an additional $72.30 for low consumption.  In addition, our bill comparison shows that somehow my wife and I managed to use 65 cubic metres more water than our neighbours.

City hall gave us some tablets for our toilets to test for leaks -- there are no leaks.  They suggested we not run any water and check our water meter to see if the little red tab is still rotating.  It isn't.

Now they are asking Vernon area residents to aprove a $70 million water upgrade, which by the way is only the beginning.

We will be saying so long Vernon.  We are not about to stay living here just to be gouged.  And really, who in their right mind would move to Vernon with the rates already so high and only to get worse?

I suppose the uniformed(sic) like us.  We now know of several younger retirees with higher than average incomes and high percentages of disposal incomes, which should be an asset to any community, who have already left or are planning to leave.  I expect we will be joining the exodus."
M.C.R. Krien




"Call for resignations at GVW," suggest Kia, "start anew, bring in Al Horning from the Black Mountain Water District as an advisor."

And not with another $650,000 study.
And tell Interior Health to be quiet unless they bring money to the table...lots of money, from both Victoria and Ottawa.

Sorry to lose you, Mr. and Mrs. Krien.
But a sincere thanks for taking the time to write the letter.

A good start would be to read this "Water Plan History Detailed, dated February 7, 2014" from Coldstream Councillor Kiss.


2 comments:

  1. In expectation of many of the same faces around the RDNO/GVAC tables for the next few years, I hold out little hope of any leadership or direction on water issues including crushing rates to users. They have spent huge sums of money on the wrong water plan and are about to continue in the same direction if the Referendum is won. The IHA issue is just a convenient excuse to hide behind. Agricultural water should come from the Aberdeen plateau (raw) and domestic needs from our 2 clean (no aluminum added) lakes. .....sounds like where we started all those years ago. I am also thinking of a relocation away from this insanity.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The Krien's experience is not surprising. The City needs to charge that much for sewer so reclaimed water for Predator Ridge, The Rise and Vernon Golf & Country Club can continue to be subsidized. Roll back that rate, Vernon!

    Meanwhile, poor cousin Hillview must continue irrigating with drinking water, because they’re not connected to reclaimed - my guess is the same applies to Highlands?

    Tacking on a flat fee because of low consumption of sewer is plain old lousy. Even more onerous is a flat fee for living next to a pipe in the ground, even if you're not connected to it. Yep, that's what Vernon does, they now consider "use" of the sewer the same as "living next to" a sewer pipe in the road. Don’t bother looking up the dictionary definition of use, here in Vernon we'll just define it however we want in our bylaw, even if you can’t actually use anything. Our neighbours and I pay the City $150 a quarter for the water and sewer to which we are not connected. That’s $600 a year for something we cannot use. No sympathy from this Council, but they sure rolled back those irrigation rates for golf courses in a hurry.

    Good corporate citizens are those who pay their bills, not those who demand subsidies from taxpayers. Just sayin’….

    ReplyDelete

Share YOUR thoughts here...